Why Does Jesus Call the Canaanite Woman a Dog?

-

Image result for dog

 Have you ever been a bit unsettled by Jesus’ reference to the Canaanite woman as a “dog.” To understand why Jesus called the Canaanite woman a dog, you need to know a little about Tyre and Messianic expectations.

 There was an expectation of the Messiah. When he comes he is going to go into places like Tyre—the very embodiment of paganism—and destroy them. You expect a Messiah to go to such a wicked place, call them all dogs, and leave—maybe lighting a match on his way out.

 Image result for city tyre

 But the Gospel of Mark is painting a different picture of the Messiah. He’s just spoken to the Pharisees about what defiles a person. It’s not what is on the outside but it’s the stuff of the inside. That kind of talk would lead a Messiah into Tyre to provide redemption instead of wrathful rebuke.

 But then when Jesus gets into Tyre he sounds more like a soldier Messiah than the type of Messiah of the Gospel of Mark. 

 Image result for city tyre

 Now some will say that Jesus is testing this woman’s faith. Others will point out that Jesus uses a term that means “puppy” instead of scavenger dog. And those are fine points to make because I think Jesus is speaking in parable here to the woman. And so far in the gospel of Mark, she’s the only one who actually understands his parable. But the keyword in this passage isn’t “dog” but “bread.”

 That’s actually the question that this whole section is about. 

  • Who is the blessing of Messiah for? 
  • Who gets to enjoy his reign? 

If you ask the Pharisees it’s them—they are the children of Israel. To hell with the Gentiles, unless of course, they become like the Pharisees. Messiah bread isn’t going to be lavished upon a place like Tyre.

 Image result for messiah's bread

 And so Jesus uses this language—and yes, I think he uses the diminutive term here to invite her into the parable. You don’t take the kids food and feed it to the puppy dog. Who qualifies for Messiah’s bread?

 In Matthew’s account, those around Jesus are telling this woman to be silent. She’s an unqualified Gentile. A defiled person isn’t going to reap the benefits of the Messiah’s healing ministry. She’d do far better to go home and find some other remedy…maybe her paganism will help her. Defiled people don’t get Messiah bread.

 Image result for Canaanite woman bread crumbs

 But the Canaanite woman, quite rightly, sees the whole in this entire way of thinking. 

  • Who puts a limit on Messiah’s bread? 
  • Why should we assume that the kids starve if the puppy gets some crumbs? 

She’s just asking for a crumb. Just a touch of his garment. Surely, there is enough Messiah to go around. And that is the point of this entire passage. That’s why Mark and Matthew put it right here. Why in the world do the gospel writers include two miraculous feedings? 

 Jesus can feed people without many resources. But notice where these feedings occur? One in Jewish country the other in Gentile territory. I don’t think that’s an accident. Nor do I think it’s accidental that chortazo (“be fed”) appears in the gospel of Mark only hear and in both of the miraculous feedings. 

 Image result for Canaanite woman bread crumbs

 I think there is a bit of a test of faith for this Canaanite woman. 

 There is wordplay going on here. But more than anything Jesus is teaching his disciples about what it really means that he is the Bread of Life. It means that He’s enough. And He doesn’t have to be stored away in fear that somehow he’s not sufficient to be given away freely to Jew and Gentile alike. Messiah takes the bread of redemption to Tyre.
Haven’t you learned the lesson of the loaves? Jesus is enough.


Popular posts from this blog

Speaking in tongues for today - Charles Stanley

-
Image
There are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. … But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all. … And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healing, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. … Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? But earnestly desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way - 1 Corinthians 12:4, 7, 28, 30—31 The Lord Jesus Christ had come and gone. The church—newly birthed—was in a transition time. The new covenant was seen as a threat to the Jewish leaders; therefore, there was persecution for those who had chosen to follow Christ. The new religion, in its infant stages, had no Bible, few leaders, and absolutely no support from the government. Astounding that it survived, isn’t it?  How in the world did it survive with so little going for it? Power. Not just a force, but mighty, visible power. Th...
Read more

What is the glory (kabod) of God?

-
Image
2 CORINTHIANS 4:17 "This light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison." Scripture places a high value on God 's glory, and it is not hard to figure out why. Since the inherent glory of the Lord is something that He will not share with others (Isa. 42:8), we know that His glory is something that He prizes highly; indeed, He prizes it more highly than anything else. We should, therefore, set the glory of God as the goal and overarching emphasis of our lives. Whatever we lose for the sake of making the Lord's glory known will be worth it when we see the dazzling light and beauty of; the divine glory (28:5; Rev. 21:23). Glory has to do with light and beauty, but those aspects do not sum up what the Bible means when it speaks of the glory of God. Interestingly, the Hebrew word kabod , which is translated into English as "glory," has the root meaning of "weight" or "heaviness....
Read more

The Holy Spirit causes us to cry out: Abba, Father

-
Image
Pentecostés. Óleo sobre lienzo, 275 × 127 cm. Madrid, Museo del Prado. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) To bring out the same truth in another way, Paul says God sent Jesus (as a Man) to live under the Law in order “to redeem those under law, that we [Jews and Gentiles ] might receive the full rights [adoption] of sons” ( Galatians 4:5).  By “full rights” or “adoption” he means entering into the privileges and responsibilities of sonship. He uses it also of the sonship of Israel (Romans 9:4). Galatians 4:1, 2 indicate that the son and heir of a wealthy family in Paul’s day would be treated as a slave until he became of age.  Then he would receive the adoption, that is, all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities that belonged to an adult member of that family. Adoption was also used in the modern sense, so that Gentiles who were not sons of Abraham became true heirs, true sons of God , by faith.  Jesus died, not just to save us from the fires of hell, bu...
Read more