Posts

Showing posts with the label Evidence

THE DOCTRINE OF THE INITIAL EVIDENCE OF THE BAPTISM IN THE HOLY SPIRIT

Image
    1.      THE UNIQUENESS OF THE DOCTRINE If it may be said that the distinctive doctrine of the Pentecostal movement is the baptism in the Holy Spirit it may also be said that what is most distinctive about this particular doctrine is the conviction that the initial evidence of this baptism is speaking in tongues. While Pentecostalism shares with classic Methodism, the holiness movements, and with many in conservative evangelicalism, the conviction of an additional critically important spiritual experience beyond conversion, it is in the understanding of the initial evidence of this subsequent experience that Pentecostals are unique, and it is this evidence which marks its advocates as Pentecostal. Wesley and his holiness followers, as we have seen, made experience or feeling of a particular sort the evidence of what was called the Great Salvation. But feeling is ambiguous and has led Methodism, historically, to quite different emphases. The ambiguity of feeli...

The Baptism in the Holy Spirit and speaking in tongues

Image
  WHAT IS THE PENTECOSTAL DISTINCTIVE? ACC REMIT 2025 A. We believe in the baptism of the Holy Spirit, which is a transformative experience, distinct from and subsequent to salvation.  It is available to all believers and accompanied by the   initial evidence of speaking in tongues .  It results in empowerment for effective witness to the world. B. We believe in the baptism of the Holy Spirit, which is a transformative experience, distinct from and subsequent to salvation.  It is available to all believers and accompanied by the sign of speaking in tongues as the  Spirit gives utterance.  It results in empowerment for effective witness to the world .   WHAT IS THE CHANGE? The change: from "initial evidence of speaking in tongues' to the "sign of speaking in tongues as the Spirit gives utterance." WHERE DOES 'AS THE SPIRIT GIVES UTTERANCE' APPEAR? On the day of Pentecost, the people were overwhelmed and dominated by the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:5)...

Tongues and Denominations and other people

Image
  Tongues: Denominational Perspectives and Current Practices Christian denominations and movements have varying beliefs regarding tongues as initial evidence vs. tongues as a spiritual gift . Below is a comparison of major traditions and their teachings. A. Classical Pentecostal Denominations (Believe in Tongues as Initial Evidence) These groups originated from the Azusa Street Revival (1906) and emphasize tongues as the initial evidence of Spirit baptism. 1. Assemblies of God (AG) Official Belief: Spirit baptism is a distinct, post-salvation experience. Tongues is the initial physical evidence of Spirit baptism. Tongues in 1 Corinthians 12 is a separate gift given selectively. Key Document: Assemblies of God Position Paper on Baptism in the Holy Spirit Supporting Scripture: Acts 2:4, 10:44-46, 19:6 Theological Authorities: Stanley M. Horton, William W. Menzies 2. Church of God (Cleveland, TN) Similar to AG, but with a stronger emphasis on holiness living ...

Further Analysis: Tongues as Initial Evidence vs. Spiritual Gift

Image
  This deeper dive will analyze the historical, theological, and linguistic perspectives on this debate. We will also explore early church history, Greek word studies, and responses to common counterarguments. I. Deeper Biblical Analysis: Acts vs. Paul’s Letters The Pentecostal argument primarily relies on Acts , while the Evangelical/Charismatic argument relies on Paul’s letters (especially 1 Corinthians). Let's examine these sources in more depth. A. The Book of Acts: Is It Normative or Descriptive? 1. Pentecostal Argument: Acts Shows a Consistent Pattern Pentecostals argue that speaking in tongues is always present when people receive the Holy Spirit: Acts 2:1-4 (Pentecost) – Tongues is explicitly mentioned. Acts 10:44-46 (Cornelius) – Tongues is explicitly mentioned. Acts 19:1-6 (Ephesus) – Tongues is explicitly mentioned. Acts 8:14-17 (Samaritans) – Tongues is not mentioned explicitly, but something visible and audible happened (implied evidence). Conclu...