Further Analysis: Tongues as Initial Evidence vs. Spiritual Gift

-

 




This deeper dive will analyze the historical, theological, and linguistic perspectives on this debate. We will also explore early church history, Greek word studies, and responses to common counterarguments.

I. Deeper Biblical Analysis: Acts vs. Paul’s Letters

The Pentecostal argument primarily relies on Acts, while the Evangelical/Charismatic argument relies on Paul’s letters (especially 1 Corinthians). Let's examine these sources in more depth.

A. The Book of Acts: Is It Normative or Descriptive?

1. Pentecostal Argument: Acts Shows a Consistent Pattern

Pentecostals argue that speaking in tongues is always present when people receive the Holy Spirit:

  • Acts 2:1-4 (Pentecost) – Tongues is explicitly mentioned.
  • Acts 10:44-46 (Cornelius) – Tongues is explicitly mentioned.
  • Acts 19:1-6 (Ephesus) – Tongues is explicitly mentioned.
  • Acts 8:14-17 (Samaritans) – Tongues is not mentioned explicitly, but something visible and audible happened (implied evidence).

Conclusion from Pentecostals: Since these accounts consistently mention tongues, it is reasonable to assume that tongues is the expected evidence of Spirit baptism.

2. Evangelical Argument: Acts is Historical, Not Doctrinal

Evangelicals argue that Acts is descriptive, not prescriptive. They point out:

  • Not every passage about Spirit baptism mentions tongues (e.g., Acts 8).
  • The purpose of Acts was to show the spread of the Gospel, not to establish a universal doctrine on tongues.
  • In Acts 2, tongues were actual languages, whereas 1 Corinthians 14 refers to tongues as a private prayer language.

Conclusion from Evangelicals: Acts records what happened but does not establish a universal doctrine that tongues must always follow Spirit baptism.

B. Paul’s Letters: Is Tongues for Every Believer?

1. Pentecostal Counterargument: Paul Encourages Tongues

Pentecostals argue that Paul was very positive about tongues:

  • 1 Corinthians 14:5 – “I wish you all spoke in tongues.”
  • 1 Corinthians 14:18 – “I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you.”
  • Romans 8:26 – “The Spirit intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words.” (Possibly referring to tongues.)

Since Paul encourages tongues and since Acts shows it as the initial evidence, Pentecostals argue that tongues is expected for Spirit-filled believers.

2. Evangelical Counterargument: Paul Teaches Diversity of Gifts

Evangelicals respond by emphasizing 1 Corinthians 12, where Paul teaches that the Spirit gives different gifts to different people:

  • 1 Corinthians 12:29-30 – “Do all speak in tongues?” The rhetorical answer is no.
  • 1 Corinthians 12:4-11 – The Spirit distributes gifts as He wills (v. 11).
  • 1 Corinthians 14:19 – “In the church, I would rather speak five words with my mind than ten thousand in a tongue.”

Since Paul does not demand tongues from everyone, evangelicals argue that not all believers must speak in tongues to prove Spirit baptism.

II. Greek Word Studies: What Do the Words Mean?

Understanding the Greek words used for baptism and tongues can clarify the issue.

A. “Baptism” (βαπτίζω, baptizō)

  • This word means “to immerse” or “to submerge.”
  • It is used for water baptism and Spirit baptism (e.g., Acts 1:5).

Insight: The term “baptism” suggests a deep, immersive experience, not just a symbolic act. Pentecostals argue that speaking in tongues is the outward sign of this immersion.

B. “Tongues” (γλῶσσα, glōssa)

  • In Acts 2:4, tongues refer to known languages (Greek: heterais glōssais).
  • In 1 Corinthians 14, tongues seem to refer to a heavenly prayer language (glōssa laleō).

Insight: The distinction between Acts and Corinthians suggests that tongues can serve different purposes (evangelism vs. personal edification).

III. Church History: What Did Early Christians Believe?

A. Early Church Fathers on Tongues

  1. Irenaeus (c. 130–202 AD) – Against Heresies

    • Mentions believers speaking in tongues and prophesying.

  2. Tertullian (c. 160–220 AD) – Against Marcion

    • Describes the ongoing practice of tongues in the church.

  3. Augustine (354–430 AD) – Homilies on 1 John

    • Believed that tongues ceased after the apostolic age.

Historical Trend:

  • Early Christians (2nd-3rd century) accepted tongues as a real, ongoing practice.
  • By the 4th century, many church leaders believed tongues had ceased.
  • The Pentecostal revival (20th century) reignited belief in tongues as initial evidence.

IV. Common Counterarguments and Responses

1. Evangelical: Paul’s Writings Never Call Tongues “Initial Evidence.”

Pentecostal Response: True, but Acts repeatedly shows tongues happening. Paul assumes people already knew this.

2. Evangelical: What About Those Who Don’t Speak in Tongues?

Pentecostal Response: They may still receive Spirit baptism but have not yet activated tongues.

3. Pentecostal: Tongues is the “Sign” of the Spirit.

Evangelical Response: 1 Corinthians 12:7 says every gift is a sign, not just tongues.

V. Conclusion: Which View is Correct?

  • If Acts is Prescriptive (Doctrine), Pentecostals Are Right.
  • If Acts is Descriptive (History), Evangelicals Are Right.

Summary of Positions

PositionKey SupportKey Objection
Pentecostal (Tongues as initial evidence)Acts 2, 10, 19 show a consistent patternPaul’s letters do not require tongues for all
Evangelical/Charismatic (Tongues as a gift)1 Corinthians 12:30 – “Do all speak in tongues?”Does not fully explain why tongues appear frequently in Acts

Final Thought:

  • If you are Pentecostal, you will see tongues as initial evidence based on Acts.
  • If you are Evangelical/Charismatic, you will see tongues as a gift among many, based on 1 Corinthians.

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking in tongues for today - Charles Stanley

-
Image
There are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. … But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all. … And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healing, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. … Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? But earnestly desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way - 1 Corinthians 12:4, 7, 28, 30—31 The Lord Jesus Christ had come and gone. The church—newly birthed—was in a transition time. The new covenant was seen as a threat to the Jewish leaders; therefore, there was persecution for those who had chosen to follow Christ. The new religion, in its infant stages, had no Bible, few leaders, and absolutely no support from the government. Astounding that it survived, isn’t it?  How in the world did it survive with so little going for it? Power. Not just a force, but mighty, visible power. Th...
Read more

What is the glory (kabod) of God?

-
Image
2 CORINTHIANS 4:17 "This light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison." Scripture places a high value on God 's glory, and it is not hard to figure out why. Since the inherent glory of the Lord is something that He will not share with others (Isa. 42:8), we know that His glory is something that He prizes highly; indeed, He prizes it more highly than anything else. We should, therefore, set the glory of God as the goal and overarching emphasis of our lives. Whatever we lose for the sake of making the Lord's glory known will be worth it when we see the dazzling light and beauty of; the divine glory (28:5; Rev. 21:23). Glory has to do with light and beauty, but those aspects do not sum up what the Bible means when it speaks of the glory of God. Interestingly, the Hebrew word kabod , which is translated into English as "glory," has the root meaning of "weight" or "heaviness....
Read more

The Holy Spirit causes us to cry out: Abba, Father

-
Image
Pentecostés. Óleo sobre lienzo, 275 × 127 cm. Madrid, Museo del Prado. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) To bring out the same truth in another way, Paul says God sent Jesus (as a Man) to live under the Law in order “to redeem those under law, that we [Jews and Gentiles ] might receive the full rights [adoption] of sons” ( Galatians 4:5).  By “full rights” or “adoption” he means entering into the privileges and responsibilities of sonship. He uses it also of the sonship of Israel (Romans 9:4). Galatians 4:1, 2 indicate that the son and heir of a wealthy family in Paul’s day would be treated as a slave until he became of age.  Then he would receive the adoption, that is, all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities that belonged to an adult member of that family. Adoption was also used in the modern sense, so that Gentiles who were not sons of Abraham became true heirs, true sons of God , by faith.  Jesus died, not just to save us from the fires of hell, bu...
Read more