Tongues: Initial Evidence of Spirit Baptism vs. Spiritual Gift

-

 


Tongues: Initial Evidence of Spirit Baptism vs. Spiritual Gift

This analysis explores both perspectives—tongues as initial evidence of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit and tongues as a spiritual gift—using biblical citations, theological arguments, and scholarly sources.

I. Tongues as the Initial Evidence of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit

This position is primarily held by Classical Pentecostals (e.g., Assemblies of God, Church of God, Foursquare Church). It teaches that every believer baptized in the Holy Spirit will speak in tongues as the first outward sign.

Biblical Evidence from Acts

Pentecostals emphasize the Book of Acts as a pattern:

  1. Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-4)

    • The disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit and "began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance."
    • This was the first instance of Spirit baptism in the New Testament.

  2. Household of Cornelius (Acts 10:44-46)

    • "The Holy Spirit fell upon all who heard the word... For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God."
    • Peter later referenced this event as proof that the Gentiles had received the same Spirit baptism as the Jews (Acts 11:15-17).

  3. Disciples in Ephesus (Acts 19:1-6)

    • Paul asked, "Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?" (v. 2).
    • When Paul laid hands on them, "the Holy Spirit came on them, and they began speaking in tongues and prophesying."

Key Pentecostal Argument

  • Since all three cases explicitly mention tongues, Pentecostals see tongues as the normative sign of Spirit baptism.
  • Other accounts of Spirit baptism (e.g., Acts 8:14-17) do not explicitly mention tongues but imply a visible and audible sign.

Theological Support

  • Howard M. Ervin, Spirit Baptism: A Biblical Investigation – Argues that Acts provides a theological pattern, not just a historical account.
  • William W. Menzies, Understanding the Assemblies of God – Defends tongues as initial evidence within Pentecostal doctrine.

II. Tongues as a Spiritual Gift (Not Required for All Believers)

This position is common among Charismatics, Evangelicals, and Reformed Christians. It holds that tongues is a gift of the Spirit, not the required sign of Spirit baptism.

Biblical Evidence from 1 Corinthians

  1. Tongues is one of many gifts (1 Corinthians 12:4-11)

    • Paul lists tongues alongside prophecy, wisdom, and healing.
    • He emphasizes that the Spirit distributes gifts individually (v. 11), meaning not all will speak in tongues.

  2. Not every believer speaks in tongues (1 Corinthians 12:30)

    • "Do all speak in tongues?" – The expected answer is no.
    • If tongues were required as initial evidence, Paul would not ask this rhetorical question.

  3. Tongues is for edification, not proof of Spirit baptism (1 Corinthians 14:4-5)

    • "The one who speaks in a tongue builds up himself."
    • Paul encourages tongues but does not make it universal.

Key Charismatic/Evangelical Argument

  • Paul’s letters were written after Acts, clarifying that tongues is one of many gifts, not a universal sign.
  • If tongues were the only evidence of Spirit baptism, why doesn’t Paul emphasize it as such in his teachings to the churches?

Theological Support

  • Gordon Fee, God’s Empowering Presence – Argues that Acts describes historical events, while Paul’s letters provide doctrinal instruction.
  • John Stott, Baptism and Fullness – Emphasizes that Spirit baptism and tongues do not necessarily go together.

III. Reconciling the Two Views

  • Pentecostals see tongues as a uniform pattern in Acts.
  • Evangelicals/Charismatics argue that Acts is descriptive, while Paul’s letters are prescriptive.

Possible Middle Ground?

Some scholars suggest that tongues may be a common but not exclusive sign of Spirit baptism.

  • Craig Keener, Gift and Giver – Suggests that tongues was the normal sign in Acts but not necessarily the only possible sign.
  • Jack Hayford, The Beauty of Spiritual Language – Argues for the benefits of tongues but does not require it for all.

IV. Bibliography (Scholarly Sources & Books for Further Study)

Books Supporting Tongues as Initial Evidence

  1. Ervin, Howard M. Spirit Baptism: A Biblical Investigation. Hendrickson Publishers, 1987.
  2. Menzies, William W. Understanding the Assemblies of God. Gospel Publishing House, 1971.
  3. Horton, Stanley M. What the Bible Says About the Holy Spirit. Gospel Publishing House, 1976.
  4. Dunn, James D.G. Baptism in the Holy Spirit. Westminster John Knox Press, 1970.

Books Supporting Tongues as a Spiritual Gift (Not Required for All)

  1. Fee, Gordon D. God’s Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul. Baker Academic, 1994.
  2. Stott, John. Baptism and Fullness: The Work of the Holy Spirit Today. InterVarsity Press, 1975.
  3. Keener, Craig. Gift and Giver: The Holy Spirit for Today. Baker Academic, 2001.
  4. MacArthur, John. Strange Fire: The Danger of Offending the Holy Spirit with Counterfeit Worship. Thomas Nelson, 2013.

V. Conclusion

  • Pentecostals hold that tongues is the initial evidence based on Acts.
  • Evangelicals and Charismatics see tongues as one of many gifts, based on Paul’s teachings.
  • The debate depends on how one interprets Acts (descriptive vs. prescriptive) and the role of Paul's epistles in defining doctrine.

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking in tongues for today - Charles Stanley

-
Image
There are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. … But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all. … And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healing, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. … Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? But earnestly desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way - 1 Corinthians 12:4, 7, 28, 30—31 The Lord Jesus Christ had come and gone. The church—newly birthed—was in a transition time. The new covenant was seen as a threat to the Jewish leaders; therefore, there was persecution for those who had chosen to follow Christ. The new religion, in its infant stages, had no Bible, few leaders, and absolutely no support from the government. Astounding that it survived, isn’t it?  How in the world did it survive with so little going for it? Power. Not just a force, but mighty, visible power. Th...
Read more

What is the glory (kabod) of God?

-
Image
2 CORINTHIANS 4:17 "This light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison." Scripture places a high value on God 's glory, and it is not hard to figure out why. Since the inherent glory of the Lord is something that He will not share with others (Isa. 42:8), we know that His glory is something that He prizes highly; indeed, He prizes it more highly than anything else. We should, therefore, set the glory of God as the goal and overarching emphasis of our lives. Whatever we lose for the sake of making the Lord's glory known will be worth it when we see the dazzling light and beauty of; the divine glory (28:5; Rev. 21:23). Glory has to do with light and beauty, but those aspects do not sum up what the Bible means when it speaks of the glory of God. Interestingly, the Hebrew word kabod , which is translated into English as "glory," has the root meaning of "weight" or "heaviness....
Read more

The Holy Spirit causes us to cry out: Abba, Father

-
Image
Pentecostés. Óleo sobre lienzo, 275 × 127 cm. Madrid, Museo del Prado. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) To bring out the same truth in another way, Paul says God sent Jesus (as a Man) to live under the Law in order “to redeem those under law, that we [Jews and Gentiles ] might receive the full rights [adoption] of sons” ( Galatians 4:5).  By “full rights” or “adoption” he means entering into the privileges and responsibilities of sonship. He uses it also of the sonship of Israel (Romans 9:4). Galatians 4:1, 2 indicate that the son and heir of a wealthy family in Paul’s day would be treated as a slave until he became of age.  Then he would receive the adoption, that is, all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities that belonged to an adult member of that family. Adoption was also used in the modern sense, so that Gentiles who were not sons of Abraham became true heirs, true sons of God , by faith.  Jesus died, not just to save us from the fires of hell, bu...
Read more